And it wasn't even a good lie, everyone can see right through it.Īll ppl saying its the right decision : I get your point ''If you're a Nintendo share holder'' and only thinking about profits !! But as customers and fans we should never agree with this kind of decision. Because they not only abandoned the Wii U suddenly, but also because they lied about the reasons for that. No matter if I buy a Switch someday or not, I will never play Yooka-Laylee. The Switch has no second screen, so there's no enticement to port Kerbal to the Yeah I asked Playtonic to refund my crowdfunding pledge for the same reason. And for this game, having a second screen makes a lot of sense. They called it the "definitive version of Kerbal Space Program" for a reason. Hm, maybe I should organize a Kickstarter The reason why they wanted to bring it to the Wii U was the second screen. For years I've been waiting for someone to basically copy the idea of the Gamepad and release a similar controller for PC. I passed on buying the game on Steam for several years now because of that.ĭon't think I will buy it for Steam ever, because there is nothing like the Wii U Gamepad for PC.Īnd honestly, I don't get why. It's really a shame, because Kerbal is perfect for the Wii U Gamepad. On January 11th they 'announced' its cancellation there. I asked myself that a few weeks ago and found this thread: ![]() I see no value in upgrading either to the switch if you meant, "Well, whatever they ditch the installed Wii U userbase, they lost another sale -I am not Switch-ing." I really don't care about graphics and performance but if I upgrade and spend 500 to 600 in hardware and accessories I at least want it to be superior to my last console but I feel that Wii - u is fine for me and I will just skip the switch and play my huge library of wii/wii u and download games for years to come since I only have time to game a maximum of 4 hours a week. Not sure if I'm spelling this right but as amazing as yooka laylee looks because of how they dropped the bomb so sudden and last minute which looks like an obvious bait and switch (no pun intended) i will no support that game but hey I wasn't going to get the Switch regardless as seeing that I already have two Wii - Us in the house and the Switch looks like a mild upgrade performance and graphic wise. They were smart to keep their fan base and there are people like me that will not support you when you break your word. If you give your word no matter what you should keep it and look at how Yacht club has been successful they could have just let their success get to their head and said forget you Wii - U backers its a dead system and move on. Wouldn't you as a developer rather long term success then short gain. Thu 26th Jan I too was looking forward to this and Rive but hey at least the developers of Shovel Knight in spite of Wii - U by industry standards being a commercial failure have kept their word.People could argue about the fanbase of the Wii U, but how many people are still playing their systems? How many will still be playing the Wii U once the Switch arrives? Why bother with a Wii U port? I think they are doing the right thing here. I don't blame a developer for getting the hell out of dodge at this point. The Wii U? Its grave is dug and its about to join its older brothers and other dead platforms in the great game system heaven in the sky. The 3DS has a future with several major titles still to come to the platform. Nintendo has already shifted their focus to the 3DS and Switch and even the last major Wii U game which is Zelda is being promoted more for the Switch then the Wii U. The Wii U has nothing going for it at this point. At this point, a Wii U port would be the same as them tossing money in a dumpster and lighting it all on fire. Like it or not, the Wii U is a dead system that has nothing major coming to it after Breath of the Wild. ![]() ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |